Agriculture

IFA launches YES campaign!

Friday, August 28th, 2009

Yesterday, the Irish Farmers Association formally launched its campaign for a YES vote in the upcoming Lisbon referendum. IFA president Padraig Walshe stressed that the current economic situation has changed how Ireland needs to address the Treaty. Particularly the fact that is it imperative that Ireland retain “full access to the European market, as well as maintain continued cooperation with international partners for exports.” For a nation so dependent upon food exports the unrestricted access to the European market is critical to the livelihoods for thousands of citizens.

Mr. Walshe also spoke of the importance of the CAP for Irish farmers and the Irish economy. Worth mentioning is that since 1973 more than 40 billion euros has been given to Ireland through the CAP. This huge sum of money has contributed to advancements in quality of life for thousands of rural farmers, introduced more efficient and cost-effective farming practices, and ensured environmental protection. Together these advancements have transformed Irish agriculture from a rural patchwork into an indispensable export oriented sector of the economy. This makes it all the more important that when the CAP payments are up for review in 2013 Ireland is in a position to play a prominent role in the decision-making process.

The IFA will be primarily focusing on campaigning for a YES vote among their 85,000 members, as well as encouraging farmers in rural areas to vote YES!

(more…)

Clarification from the Commission

Thursday, August 27th, 2009

The European Commission has been criticized recently for publishing a rebuttal to allegations from ‘Farmer’s for NO’ on their website. The Commission delegation published a five point refutation on issues such as inheritance rights, EU voting weights, and the accession of Turkey. Opponents of the Lisbon Treaty have argued that the Commission’s actions are a direct interference with the referendum process.

Certainly the referendum process is about allowing Irish citizens to voice their concerns, and ultimately decide the outcome without interference from outside bodies. But in this case the Commission was not interfering, rather clarifying what the treaty actually says. If information is blatantly manipulated or incorrect, a distorted picture of reality will be what citizens are voting on. It is more important to have correct and accurate information when forming opinions and viewpoints that will ultimately influence a very important decision. In this case the Commission was not interfering or trying to influence voters’, rather correcting erroneous statements.

Nick M